Welding Journal
Front Page
Industry News
Press Time News
Washington
Watchworld
Cyber Notes
Society News
|
Seismic Retrofitting
of a Bridge
A San Francisco Bay Area bridge is upgraded to help it survive earthquakes
By M. Patrick Flatley and Michael T. O'Reilly
Information gathered from several significant earthquakes over the last 20 years has motivated the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to evaluate the survivability of the major bridges in the San Francisco Bay area. Five major bridges within the Caltrans toll bridge system are currently undergoing seismic retrofit in the Bay Area - the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, the Carquinez Bridge, the San Mateo Bridge, and the Benicia Bridge, as well as the Richmond-San Rafael structure. Seismic retrofit at the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge started
in 1999 for an estimated cost of half a billion dollars, one of
the largest contracts ever released by Caltrans. The original
structure was constructed between 1952 and 1956 at a cost of $66 million - Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 - Crews on barges reinforce the foundations of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge over San Francisco Bay.
Seismic retrofit work has been completed for the San Mateo and Carquinez Bridges. Construction is presently under way for the west spans of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and the Benecia Bridge. The Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, linking Contra Costa County to Marin County in the north bay, is scheduled for completion in 2004. In the Bay Area, several other projects are also under way. New replacement west spans of the Bay Bridge and seismic upgrades to the Golden Gate Bridge are in progress. A new concrete tower suspension bridge is being constructed west of the existing southbound spans of the Carquinez Bridge, and the San Mateo Bridge is receiving a new parallel addition for increased capacity.
The east approach of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge is just four miles west of the active Hayward Fault and several secondary faults. The San Andreas Fault is about ten miles west of the bridge. In addition to close proximity to the two major fault lines, the consideration of the bridge's survivability in an earthquake due to liquefaction was an important design consideration. Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs in the soil as a result of violent shaking during a seismic event. Soft clays and water-saturated geologic sand layers are most susceptible to this phenomenon. During a seismic event, the soft clay and sand turn into slurry, which has almost no ability to support the weight of structures. A majority of the damage that occurred in the bay area during the Loma Prieta quake in 1989 was due to liquefaction. Prior to the Loma Prieta quake, the Hayward Fault was considered to be inactive, because the last major earthquake, attributed to movement along the San Andreas intersection with the Calaveras Fault in 1906, may have relieved stresses built up in crustal rock along local secondary fault lines. Since 1996, the new IBC (International Building Code) and ASSHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges have included stringent requirements for seismic event survivability. Much of the knowledge gained after the 6.9 magnitude Loma Prieta quake and the more recent North Ridge and Kobe quakes is used in evaluating the effect of high-magnitude seismic (6.2 on the Richter Scale) events for the survivability of bridge structures and foundations. This is the design philosophy for upgrading other bridges throughout California, but the retrofit for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge is the most extensive to date.
 Fig. 2 - Forming rollers at XKT, Inc., facility at the retired Mare Island Navy Shipyard in Vallejo, Calif.
Strengthening of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge begins at the foundations of the steel piers and towers. In situ Brinell hardness and spectrographic tests, taken at the main span tower base plates, indicate the steel used in the original structure was specified to meet ASTM A7 standards. Superstructure alterations include replacing some structural members and "building up" others. The existing steel bent piers are upgraded with the addition of conventional moment frames as well as special eccentrically braced frames (EBFs).
Tudor-Saliba/Koch/Tidewater Joint Venture is the prime contractor and D. L. McQuaid is the joint venture's quality control manager. Approximately 75% of the new pile casings have been completed and about 35% of the structural steel subassemblies are in various stages of construction. The pile casings and structural assemblies are fabricated in Vancouver, Wash., St. Louis, Portland, and Salt Lake City.
XKT, Inc., one of the project's steel fabricators, is located at the retired Mare Island Navy Shipyard in Vallejo, Calif., just across the bay. A portion of the structural steel for the steel piers and superstructure sections is fabricated there. The company acquired shop equipment from the U.S. Navy, upgraded it, and installed modern computerized equipment. They have forming rollers that can handle material up to 5-in. thick - Fig. 2. The subassemblies are welded at FCAW-S and SAW stations. Welding procedures and welders are qualified under the supervision of shop CWIs and approved by Caltrans' Materials Evaluation and Testing Service (METS) inspectors. At XKT, bents and tower sections for the steel pier retrofit are assembled and shipped to the project site via barge for installation.
Modern steel fabrication shops at Oregon Iron Works, Thompson Metal Fab, and Universal Structural in Vancouver and Portland are fabricating structural steel subassemblies for shipment to XKT for final fitup. These subassemblies include tower sections (Fig. 3) and pin bases (Fig. 4) along with superstructure retrofit assemblies. Shop CWIs and METS inspectors perform acceptance inspections, and all subassemblies are fitted for bolt-up prior to shipping. Inorganic zinc primer coatings are applied at the Mare Island and Vancouver plants.
 Fig. 3 - A steel tower section subassembly for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.
Large-diameter pile casings for the foundation retrofit are being fabricated at Trans Bay Steel in Napa, Calif., and Eaton Metal Products in Salt Lake City. SAW is used for welding thicknesses up to 21Ž2 in., and self-shielded FCAW (Fig. 5) is used for backing welds and repairs. Ultrasonic testing of 25% of transverse and circumferential welds, based on length, is done prior to shipping casing sections. Pile casings are splice-welded as necessary to meet specified tip elevation during the pile driving operation.
Skyline Steel/Profab in St. Louis is manufacturing 66-in. x 3Ž4-in. pile casings using SAW to complete spiral-welded sections. These will be used for CISS (cast in steel shell) piles where reinforced concrete is cast in drilled holes to the specified tip elevation with a socket cut into the bedrock. At the plant, the 66-in. pile sections are inspected to AWS D1.1, Section 6, with UT, meeting the acceptance criteria in Table 6.3.
 Fig. 4 - Pin base subassembly.
All structural steel is being fabricated to the requirements of AWS D1.1 and D1.5, with approximately 18,500 tons of steel to be used in the retrofit. Concrete reinforcing FW (flash-welded) steel hoops and cages are manufactured in Los Angeles and assembled on site for the west approach pier foundations. The large-diameter pile casings are shipped from Napa by barge and from Salt Lake City by trucks. Pile casings are made from ASTM A252 Gr. 3 steel plate in thickness ranges from 3Ž4 to 21Ž2 in., and 66 to 155 in. in diameter. The longest large-diameter pile is 150 in. by 140 ft. Pile sections are welded and driven from work barges in the bay. The pile-driving hammer for large-diameter piles weighs approximately 17,000 lb, and a barge-mounted crane was assembled on-site to handle the leads and hammer. Field welds are qualified for FCAW and SMAW to AWS D1.5 requirements for superstructure and deck strengthening members. Pile casing field welds are qualified to AWS D 1.1. The quality of most structural welds are verified using UT, meeting the acceptance requirements of AWS D1.5 for cyclic and statically loaded structures as specified in contract documents. Once on-site, the casings are loaded on work barges for installation. Structural steel must meet ASTM A709 Gr. 50 or Gr. 65 and be made in the United States.
At the shops, CWI visual inspection and nondestructive examination are used to assure weld quality. Most structural subassemblies are subject to ultrasonic and magnetic particle testing. Some of the more critical beam and column splices are radiographed. The overall weld quality is assessed by METS. Pre-installation inspection is done on site by the joint venture's QC department and accepted by the engineer. Currently, the rejection rate for manufactured assemblies has not exceeded 2%. All repairs are made using either SMAW or FCAW. Any unacceptable SAW pile repairs are done using FCAW or, if necessary, defective welds are cut out. Field welded pile casing repairs are air arc gouged or ground to sound metal, inspected using magnetic particle tests, and then repaired. Field weld rejection rate is less than 1%, based on linear feet of weld.
 Fig. 5 - Flux cored arc backing weld of pile casing.
In determining how best to accomplish the seismic retrofit, design engineers analyze and approve both construction methods and weld joint details. During the retrofit design phase, A. L. Collins, welding consultant to the design team at Ben C. Gerwick, Inc., made recommendations for welded connections and specified the construction sequence for several critical welded connections. Prior to completing their design, engineers tested a full size eccentrically braced frame (EBF). The EBFs are designed to allow plastic deformation in the frames' link beams, avoiding failure of the tower structures. The yield strength of these members is specified at 65 ksi maximum. The results of these tests were used in computer modeling of possible earthquake loading effects on the bridge. The contract special provisions require implementation of AWS D1.5, Section 12, for fracture critical welds, the failure of which would jeopardize bridge survivability during an earthquake. These welds are noted in the contract drawings and documents. The contractor was required to submit a fracture control plan, meeting AASHTO specification requirements, for approval by the engineer. Shops building fracture critical assemblies must be certified AISC Category III for Major Steel Bridges with Fracture Critical Ratings. Welding procedure specifications must meet stringent acceptance criterion, including Category 2 impact tests, as described in Section 10.3.3 of the AAHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. AWS D1.5, Section 12.16, for inspection of fracture critical structures also requires special qualifications for QA inspectors, QC inspectors, and NDE technicians.
M. PATRICK FLATLEY, P.E., and MICHAEL T. O'REILLY, (760) 420-5293, are with Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc.
|
|