Be in the next issue of Welding Journal, Inspection Trends, Product Literature Review, Welding Marketplace....Call 1– 800– 443– 9353 ext. 243  
Home | Shop | Expo | Membership
Services Publications Sections Committees Forums




  Welding Journal
  Front Page

  Industry News
  Press Time News
  Washington
  Watchworld

  Cyber Notes
  Society News


Join AWS
Cost-Effective Gas Delivery Systems
for GTA Welding of Stainless Steel

Careful consideration given to designing and selecting a gas delivery system can lead to cost savings in your welding operation

BY RICHARD GREEN


Fig. 1 —An automatic switchover provides constant line pressure to maintain weld quality.
Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) is a process commonly used in joining stainless steel that offers superior weld quality, controllable heat input, and flexibility. Typically, GTAW is a manual process, but it can be easily configured for automation with or without filler metal. Stainless steel is classified by the material's microstructure such as austenite, martensite, ferrite, duplex (ferrite and austenite), and precipitation hardened structures.

The following discussion evaluates cost-effective gas delivery systems for argon, argon/helium, and argon/hydrogen shielding gases for GTA welding of series 200 and 300 austenitic stainless steel.

Take Time to Select the Right Equipment
Careful consideration and attention to detail are required when selecting the proper equipment to meet the needs of the application. Not all equipment (flowmeter, blender, auto-switchover) is designed to work in unison to maintain the desired gas blend. Argon is the simplest shielding gas to deliver.

The first step in designing a cost-effective gas delivery system is to determine the peak and average usage requirements. Peak usage is defined as the sum of the shielding and back purge flow rates at each weld station. Peak usage establishes the maximum flow rate that the system must be capable of supplying. Average usage factors the duty cycle or amount of arc on time.

High-pressure cylinders are the ideal choice for weekly consumptions up to 1500 ft3. At this usage level, labor and product cost savings are achieved by changing the gas delivery mode from individual high-pressure cylinders to a central liquid can supply system. Instead of liquid cans, 12 to 18 high-pressure bundles or "packs" supply helium and hydrogen with a total capacity between 4000 and 6000 ft3. Cylinders with 4500 lb/in.2 offer 40% higher capacity within the same footprint, as compared to the standard 2400 lb/in.2 cylinders.

The typical liquid can has an argon capacity of 4500 ft3 and offers a product cost savings of 10 to 20%. Additional liquid cans may be required if the peak flow rate exceeds the single liquid can continuous gaseous flow capacity of 350 ft3/h.

When supplying multiple stations from a central gas supply system, it is important to maintain the supply of gas even when the liquid can runs out or during the exchange of empty cylinders. For this task, an automatic switchover, illustrated in Fig. 1, provides a constant line pressure during the transition to the reserve supply, maintaining weld quality.

Microbulk Delivery Might Fit Your Needs
Fig. 2 —An argon 1000-L microbulk vessel installed beside a liquid can (Valley National Gases, Inc., Washington, Pa.).

For weekly consumptions greater than 10,000 ft3, the end user may benefit from a microbulk delivery mode. The micro-bulk mode utilizes a permanently installed on site liquid vessel that offers argon capacities ranging from 10,000 to 40,000 ft3.

Figure 2 illustrates an installed argon 1000-L microbulk vessel beside a liquid can. With product costs being similar to liquid cans, the microbulk tank offers the advantage of eliminating the residual return loss associated with pressure differential automatic switchovers and liquid cans. When weekly argon gas consumption exceeds 20,000 ft3, bulk tanks with a minimum hold capacity of 169,000 ft3, become the preferred delivery mode.

However, tube trailers are the next gas mode progression when helium or hydrogen consumption exceeds 16,000 ft3 per week. Tube trailers create storage space logistical problems because it is necessary to have a double "bay" receiving area for loading and unloading new trailers. Trailer rental rates and residual loss also must be factored into the cost analysis.

Understand the Blender
Fig. 3 —Gas blending delivery system.

Whether supplied by high-pressure bundles, liquid cans, or microbulk, the first step in designing a gas system as illustrated in Fig. 3 for argon/helium and argon/hydrogen mixtures involves selecting the right blender (mixer) for the application. Typical parameters to consider are flow demand, gas types, usage cycle, and desired level of accuracy.

There are two common types of blenders used for this initial gas mode change, both with advantages and disadvantages. The first and simplest is the proportional blender. This design maintains constant pressure into the mixing chamber (flow control valve) by using the incoming supply of one gas to pilot or maintain equal pressure across both the primary and secondary inlet regulators.

When flow demand exceeds a minimum threshold, usually 30 ft3/h, the pressure across the flow control valve is constant, and the ensuing mixed gas is accurate. However, the end user will start to notice gas mix tolerance changes (blend drift) when flow demand dips below the designed range. The change in mix accuracy is affected by the inherent droop of the inlet regulators and the minute difference in spring closing force acting on each seat.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Blenders
Fig. 4 —Electric surge tank gas mixer.

The advantages of the proportional blender (low cost, nonelectric design) are offset by the inability to maintain blend accuracy at low-flow conditions. The change in gas mix will affect arc transfer characteristics, which might create additional spatter, bad welds, or production delays due to purging requirements. Low-flow conditions usually occur over production break periods, which would include lunch, shift changes, and weekend time frames.

the electric surge tank gas mixer, as illustrated in Fig. 4, overcomes the limitations of the proportional gas mixer by incorporating three additional components. The electric pressure switch monitors the surge tank pressure and causes the electric solenoid valve to open and close to maintain the pressure drop across the mixing chamber. This ensures an accurate mix under all flow conditions.

The downside to this design is that an external electrical supply is required. Maintenance will be required of the electrical pressure switches and solenoid valves due to standard use or possibly poor quality input power.

Simply adding a surge tank to the standard proportional blender does not address blend drift at low- or no-flow conditions. Special precaution must be taken when mixing flammable gases such as hydrogen. The electric design must incorporate explosion-proof or intrinsically safe electrical components, which increases the capital cost of the mixer.

Point-of-Use Equipment Is Important, Too
Finally, the end user should select the appropriate point-of-use equipment. Options vary from simple flow orifices to flowmeters, both of which require a 30 lb/in.2 fixed line pressure to maintain an accurate reading. An alternative solution is a station regulator flowmeter combination. Per the CGA E-3 standard, regulators must have a union connection such as a CGA 034 (7/8-14 UNF 2B-RH) to connect to a pipeline unless connected by pipe threads or bolted flanges, etc.

A local station valve is recommended to isolate the regulator and flow control equipment to allow for proper servicing. The final point-of-use option is a station drop assembly that includes the regulator, flowmeter, valve, and termination drip leg.

Bottom Line Improvement
Table 1 gives an example of the driving forces behind the design criteria of a cost-effective gas delivery system. A central gas supply system will improve productivity by eliminating cylinder exchange downtime. Shop safety will be improved by eliminating cylinder handling related injuries, which is sure to have a positive effect on a company's insurance premium. Reduction in cylinder residual loss and gas purchase price will further enhance the rate of return.

Many options abound. With careful forethought regarding the gas delivery system, you will enhance your cost position without sacrificing the structural and metallurgical properties of GTA welded stainless steel.

Characteristics of Stainless Steel and Shielding Gases

In selecting and designing a gas delivery system, it is important to understand which properties of stainless are critical in the welded condition.

Stainless steel offers several benefits over mild steel, such as corrosion resistance in aggressive media due to a minimum of 12 to 26% by weight chromium (Cr) in iron (Fe), which forms a continuous layer of chromium oxide on the surface. This oxide layer provides a protective film for the base material, which maintains its serviceability in a variety of applications.

However, in marine environments, the regenerating nature of the chromium oxide layer is hindered when the oxygen content is depleted in and around joint designs that create inherent crevices. Corrosion or "stain" resistance makes the 300 series stainless an excellent choice for food and petrochemical applications. Nickel concentrations of 3 to 22% by weight stabilize the austenite grain structure to provide good toughness characteristics at both elevated and cryogenic temperatures. Carbon (C), manganese (Mn), and nitrogen (N) also stabilize the austenite structure.

Changes During Welding
As stainless steel is welded, however, it undergoes melting and resolidification that leads to the possibility of other structures forming due to alloying elements. Depending on the weld cycle, ferrite may form due to the content of chromium, molybdenum (Mo), and niobium (Nb). Small amounts of ferrite in an austenitic stainless help prevent weld cracks.


Fig. 5 (right) —The Shaeffler ferrite prediction diagram.

It is very important to control the amount of ferrite in the weld because at cryogenic temperatures, ferrite loses its toughness. Secondly, at elevated temperatures, ferrite becomes brittle. There are two commonly used methods for predicting the resulting ferrite number (FN). The Shaeffler diagram (Fig. 5) and the Welding Research Council WRC–1992 diagram (Fig. 6) compare the sum weighted nickel equivalent to the weighted chromium equivalent in the resultant weld.



Fig. 6 (left) —Ferrite prediction diagram (Welding Research Council, WRC–1992).
The nickel equivalent represents the austenite-forming alloys on the vertical axis. An exception is that the WRC–1992 diagram accounts for nitrogen content. The chromium equivalent represents the ferrite-forming alloys on the horizontal axis. If the chemical composition is not known, a magnet or Severn gauge can be used based on the relationship between magnetic response and ferrite content —the higher the magnetic response the higher the ferrite content. Molybdenum, titanium (Ti), and niobium are also added to the basic iron-chromium-nickel alloy because they have a greater affinity to combine with carbon than does chromium. This in turn maintains the concentration of chromium available to replenish the oxide layer to prevent pitting in sulfur and other corrosive environments.

Considerations for Weld Procedures
Even though the austenitic 200 and 300 series stainless steels are considered the most weldable, variables such as joint design, service condition, material thickness, and the correct shielding gas must be considered to ensure the desired characteristics are retained. A successful weld procedure should also take into account the effects of the shielding gas ionization potential, thermal conductivity, reactivity, density, and total cost of ownership.

GTAW Process and Its Shielding Gas
Fig. 7 — Schematic of basic GTAW torch.


Figure 7 illustrates the basic setup for GTA welding. The GTAW power supply is typically set up for direct current electrode negative (DCEN), meaning the negative terminal is connected to the torch and the positive to the workpiece. This establishes the current flow toward the part being welded. As the power supply is engaged, an electric arc is established with the workpiece. The shielding gas is then ionized to create a plasma of flowing electrons. The ionization or electron donating process occurs with a gas once sufficient energy in the form of electron volts is applied by the electric arc to remove the electron furthest away from the atom core. A gas with low ionization potential offers superior arc starts and arc stability. Figure 8 lists the ionization potential of several gases. Gases at the other end of the spectrum, such as helium, require a higher arc voltage to free the electrons and maintain the plasma, therefore offering a "hotter" arc. This increases the heat input for joining thicker and higher thermally conductive materials.

A successful weld procedure should take into account the effects
of shielding gas ionization potential, thermal conductivity,
reactivity, density, and total cost of ownership.

Gas Ionization Potential
However, gas ionization potential and its contribution to heat input must be considered when welding the 300 series stainless because of the material's high coefficient of thermal expansion, which may cause part distortion. Argon offers smooth arc starting characteristics due to its low ionization potential. A mixture of argon and helium is used on thicker material because it offers the benefits of each gas.


Fig. 8 ‹ Ionization potential of several gases (source: Mark Winter, Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, England).
Once the arc is established, the plasma gas begins to distribute the heat radially toward the workpiece. Gases with a low thermal conductivity exhibit a narrow arc with a high inner core temperature that produces a deep funnel penetration profile. Figure 9 illustrates in ascending order the thermal conductivity of various gases. Gases at the other end of the spectrum conduct more heat radially, thereby producing a wider but shallower penetration profile.

In the ionized state, gases have the potential to react with the molten weld pool chemically or via diffusion into the adjacent austenitic microstructure. Hydrogen, a diatomic molecule, is commonly mixed with argon in concentrations from zero to five percent to enhance weld characteristics. Hydrogen's reducing, electron-donating characteristic allows it to react with the cooling weld pool to minimize the amount of oxide formation. This creates a cleaner weld and improves wettability.


Fig. 9 ‹ Thermal conductivity of various gases. (Source: Tsidoro Martinez, Department of Thermodynamics, Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain.)
Maintain Weld Chemistry
Careful control of the weld procedure must be taken to prevent cracking and embrittlement due to trapped hydrogen. Small concentrations of nitrogen may be added to argon in an effort to stabilize the austenite structure, but proper weld chemistry must be maintained to ensure the minimum concentration of ferrite formation to prevent cracking. Argon and helium are considered to be chemically inert and not reactive with the cooling weld pool.

The effects of gas density can most easily be seen in the shielding gas flow rate required to prevent atmospheric contamination. Hydrogen and helium are both lighter than air and require flow rates two to three times higher than argon, which is heavier than air. It is because of this and the cost per cubic foot that industry has spent considerable development time in helium recovery and alternative shielding gas technologies.


V. R. Davé and D. A. Hartman are with the Nuclear Materials and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex. J .H. Cowles, Jr., is with Ingenium Technologies Group, Somers, Conn. D. S. Lindland and G. C. SHUBERT are with Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, Conn. W. LIN is Director of Research, Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, Ohio.

 


    About AWS | Contact AWS | Advertise with AWS

Copyright © American Welding Society, All Rights Reserved